Developer Profile

Taufik Nurrohman

@taufik-nurrohman

Banyumas, Indonesia

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

61 / 100Raw: 344.00

Repository Score

58 / 100Raw: 140.00

PR Score

67 / 100Raw: 608.00

Contribution Score

42 / 100Raw: 71.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)18% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)80% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)2% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1text-editor

stars32

forks5

JavaScript 10000%

Score

#2flat-file-guestbook

stars28

forks8

PHP 8400%CSS 1600%

Score

#3tag-picker

stars29

forks3

JavaScript 10000%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1(chore) add `name` attribute to all language grammars

in highlightjs/highlight.js

stars on the PR repository24993

+192/-8

JavaScript 6400%CSS 3500%HTML 100%

111

Score

#2New Theme: Agate

in highlightjs/highlight.js

stars on the PR repository24993

+137/-0

JavaScript 6400%CSS 3500%HTML 100%

110

Score

#3Update agate.css

in highlightjs/highlight.js

stars on the PR repository24993

+72/-40

JavaScript 6400%CSS 3500%HTML 100%

105

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

File Extension as Aliases

highlightjs/highlight.js

stars24993

comments29

Score

#2Issue

Line-ending specification for open and close tags

commonmark/commonmark-spec

stars5142

comments8

Score

#3Issue

(css) Nesting Function-Like Bug

highlightjs/highlight.js

stars24993

comments4

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

Merged external PRs counted

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology