Developer Profile

Stephen Celis

@stephencelis

California

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

76 / 100Raw: 1900.00

Repository Score

65 / 100Raw: 187.00

PR Score

93 / 100Raw: 4012.00

Contribution Score

52 / 100Raw: 108.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)4% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)95% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)1% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1SQLite.swift

stars10189

forks1611

Swift 9900%

Score

#2ghi

stars2120

forks132

Ruby 10000%

Score

#3timeframe

stars287

forks54

JavaScript 10000%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1Bump to IssueReporting 2.0

in pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture

stars on the PR repository14893

+140/-14

Swift 10000%

106

Score

#2Add `scope(_:action:)` and `Scope(_:action:)`

in pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture

stars on the PR repository14893

+804/-370

Swift 10000%

106

Score

#3Reducer enum action fixes

in pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture

stars on the PR repository14893

+210/-23

Swift 10000%

106

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Discussion

Composable navigation beta 2

pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture

stars14893

comments19

Score

#2Issue

Key path sendability warning should be suppressed

swiftlang/swift

stars70323

comments12

Score

#3Discussion

Road to 1.0

pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture

stars14893

comments12

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

300

Merged external PRs counted

300

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology