Developer Profile

Shigma

@shigma

Beijing, China

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

70 / 100Raw: 1427.00

Repository Score

55 / 100Raw: 120.00

PR Score

91 / 100Raw: 3035.00

Contribution Score

41 / 100Raw: 69.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)4% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)96% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)0% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1schemastery

stars89

forks21

watchers1

TypeScript52%Vue46%SCSS2%

Score

#2cosmokit

stars15

forks5

watchers1

TypeScript100%

Score

#3reggol

stars8

forks5

watchers1

TypeScript100%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1fix(core): stop service lookup at isolation boundaries

in cordiverse/cordis

stars on the PR repository9212

+170/-64

TypeScript100%

100

Score

#2feat(core): merge injected metadata before context intercepts

in cordiverse/cordis

stars on the PR repository9212

+158/-67

TypeScript100%

100

Score

#3fix(core): dispose providers after their dependents

in cordiverse/cordis

stars on the PR repository9212

+825/-37

TypeScript100%

100

Score

Community Contributions

Most impactful public issues and discussions

#1Issue

fetch with AbortController signal memory leak (still)

nodejs/node

stars122377

comments7

Score

#2Issue

RFC: i18n configurations

koishijs/koishi

stars6254

comments9

Score

#3Issue

[Bug]: 出现滑条链接后立即崩溃

Mrs4s/go-cqhttp

stars10620

comments7

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

281

Merged external PRs counted

281

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology