Developer Profile

Sebastian Lyng Johansen

@seblyng

Oslo

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

71 / 100Raw: 1103.00

Repository Score

58 / 100Raw: 138.00

PR Score

88 / 100Raw: 2287.00

Contribution Score

55 / 100Raw: 121.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)6% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)93% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)1% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1roslyn.nvim

stars920

forks63

Lua 10000%

Score

#2dotfiles

stars22

forks3

Lua 7900%Shell 1500%Python 500%

Score

#3nvim-tabline

stars47

forks6

Lua 10000%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1feat(ui): add vim.ui.input and use in lsp rename

in neovim/neovim

stars on the PR repository102080

+106/-13

Vim Script 4000%Lua 3300%C 2700%

121

Score

#2feat(extui): use winborder for msg window

in neovim/neovim

stars on the PR repository102080

+50/-30

Vim Script 4000%Lua 3300%C 2700%

112

Score

#3feat(float): open float relative to mouse

in neovim/neovim

stars on the PR repository102080

+53/-5

Vim Script 4000%Lua 3300%C 2700%

103

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

Commenting is too restrictive for toggling uncomment

neovim/neovim

stars102080

comments19

Score

#2Issue

Sometimes error on updating plugins

wbthomason/packer.nvim

stars8099

comments21

Score

#3Issue

LSP: actually `exit` server in exit handler

dotnet/roslyn

stars20637

comments14

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

Merged external PRs counted

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology