Developer Profile

Saúl Piña

@sauljabin

Quito, Ecuador

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

57 / 100Raw: 329.00

Repository Score

55 / 100Raw: 121.00

PR Score

67 / 100Raw: 602.00

Contribution Score

27 / 100Raw: 37.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)17% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)82% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)1% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1kaskade

stars1023

forks20

Python 9900%CSS 100%

Score

#2cheatsheets

stars10

forks18

Score

#3xmlrpcwsc-dotnet

stars34

forks21

C# 10000%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1fix: improve littlehorse test container

in littlehorse-enterprises/littlehorse

stars on the PR repository397

+260/-110

Java 5400%TypeScript 2500%Python 1000%

Score

#2chore(security): upgrade dependencies

in littlehorse-enterprises/littlehorse

stars on the PR repository397

+268/-252

Java 5400%TypeScript 2500%Python 1000%

Score

#3fix(sdk-python): windows compatible

in littlehorse-enterprises/littlehorse

stars on the PR repository397

+430/-266

Java 5400%TypeScript 2500%Python 1000%

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

Request: ksqlDB

simple-icons/simple-icons

stars25763

comments3

Score

#2Discussion

Is it possible to fit a DataTable to the container?

Textualize/textual

stars37110

comments2

Score

#3Discussion

Kayak is alive

Textualize/textual

stars37110

comments2

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

292

Merged external PRs counted

292

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology