Developer Profile

Oscar Beaumont

@oscartbeaumont

Western Australia

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

71 / 100Raw: 1501.00

Repository Score

56 / 100Raw: 126.00

PR Score

91 / 100Raw: 3189.00

Contribution Score

48 / 100Raw: 93.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)4% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)96% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)0% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1vite-plugin-relay

stars89

forks15

TypeScript 9200%Shell 800%

Score

#2netlify-dynamic-dns

stars65

forks18

Go 8900%Shell 800%Dockerfile 300%

Score

#3spotistats

stars13

forks1

TypeScript 9900%CSS 100%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1More More P2P Docs

in spacedriveapp/spacedrive

stars on the PR repository38922

+273/-199

Rust 7700%TypeScript 2000%Python 100%

116

Score

#2Serve files over p2p

in spacedriveapp/spacedrive

stars on the PR repository38922

+385/-61

Rust 7700%TypeScript 2000%Python 100%

116

Score

#3More P2P docs

in spacedriveapp/spacedrive

stars on the PR repository38922

+3090/-1590

Rust 7700%TypeScript 2000%Python 100%

116

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Discussion

Retrieve default values from schema

colinhacks/zod

stars43913

comments23

Score

#2Discussion

Suggest an integration

spacedriveapp/spacedrive

stars38922

comments19

Score

#3Issue

Solutions for deduplicated SEO tags

wakujs/waku

stars6431

comments17

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

300

Merged external PRs counted

300

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology