Developer Profile

Nico Lehmann

@nilehmann

Santiago, Chile

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

54 / 100Raw: 593.00

Repository Score

29 / 100Raw: 41.00

PR Score

81 / 100Raw: 1260.00

Contribution Score

42 / 100Raw: 73.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)3% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)96% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)1% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1wavelet-tree

stars31

forks11

C++ 10000%

Score

#2liquid-rust

stars37

forks1

Rust 9600%TeX 400%

Score

#3backtracetk

stars28

forks0

Rust 10000%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1Re-expose nested bodies in rustc_borrowck::consumers

in rust-lang/rust

stars on the PR repository117435

+107/-62

Rust 9100%HTML 600%Shell 100%

128

Score

#2vim: Add sneak motion

in zed-industries/zed

stars on the PR repository89756

+301/-5

Rust 9800%Python 100%

125

Score

#3Make buffer search aware of search direction

in zed-industries/zed

stars on the PR repository89756

+80/-25

Rust 9800%Python 100%

117

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

Exception on startup after updating to 0.6.7 (pygments_cache)

xonsh/xonsh

stars9630

comments15

Score

#2Issue

Issues with search in vim mode

zed-industries/zed

stars89756

comments6

Score

#3Issue

LH produces duplicate specifications for measures whose type contains String

ucsd-progsys/liquidhaskell

stars1334

comments11

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

300

Merged external PRs counted

300

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology