Developer Profile

Kamil Mysliwiec

@kamilmysliwiec

Poland

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

63 / 100Raw: 1802.00

Repository Score

35 / 100Raw: 53.00

PR Score

93 / 100Raw: 3921.00

Contribution Score

57 / 100Raw: 134.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)1% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)98% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)1% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1nest-cqrs-example

stars545

forks117

TypeScript 10000%

Score

#2azure-serverless-sample

stars25

forks4

TypeScript 9300%JavaScript 700%

Score

#3huffman-algorithm

stars18

forks5

C++ 9400%C 600%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1feat(core): sse signal

in nestjs/nest

stars on the PR repository76604

+718/-86

TypeScript 10000%

124

Score

#2Revert "chore(deps-dev): bump @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin from 8.60.0 to 8.65.0"

in nestjs/nest

stars on the PR repository76604

+88/-88

TypeScript 10000%

124

Score

#3fix(platform-fastify): fouRoutes middleware ending slash

in nestjs/nest

stars on the PR repository76604

+116/-52

TypeScript 10000%

124

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

[Discussion] Who is using Nest in production?

nestjs/nest

stars76604

comments392

Score

#2Issue

Add more transport strategies (microservices)

nestjs/nest

stars76604

comments30

Score

#3Issue

[next] Major release notes & plans

nestjs/swagger

stars1892

comments29

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

300

Merged external PRs counted

300

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology