Developer Profile

Jhabriel Varela

@jhabriel

Asunción, Paraguay

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

40 / 100Raw: 180.00

Repository Score

28 / 100Raw: 40.00

PR Score

54 / 100Raw: 349.00

Contribution Score

33 / 100Raw: 48.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)10% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)87% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)3% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1fv-unsat

stars6

forks1

MATLAB 10000%

Score

#2non_matching_estimates

stars2

forks0

Python 8400%GLSL 1600%

Score

#3pp-implementations

stars5

forks5

Jupyter Notebook 9700%Python 200%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1Geiger 3d as PorePy example

in pmgbergen/porepy

stars on the PR repository318

+1432/-0

Python 5400%Jupyter Notebook 4500%GLSL 100%

Score

#2Setups for cases 1 and 3, flow benchmark 2d

in pmgbergen/porepy

stars on the PR repository318

+1062/-494

Python 5400%Jupyter Notebook 4500%GLSL 100%

Score

#3Setup for case 3, flow benchmark 3d

in pmgbergen/porepy

stars on the PR repository318

+320/-0

Python 5400%Jupyter Notebook 4500%GLSL 100%

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

Unify fracture network generation in 2D and 3D

pmgbergen/porepy

stars318

comments34

Score

#2Issue

Compute geometry of `bg` when `sd` is replaced

pmgbergen/porepy

stars318

comments8

Score

#3Issue

Workflow for running slow tests

pmgbergen/porepy

stars318

comments8

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

Merged external PRs counted

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

External issues counted

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology