Developer Profile

Jorge Galat

@jgalat

Argentina

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

58 / 100Raw: 494.00

Repository Score

43 / 100Raw: 74.00

PR Score

77 / 100Raw: 1007.00

Contribution Score

41 / 100Raw: 71.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)7% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)92% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)1% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1remote-app

stars82

forks4

TypeScript 9800%JavaScript 100%Kotlin 100%

Score

#2image-sorter

stars48

forks1

Rust 10000%

Score

#3ds-weapons-api

stars9

forks2

Haskell 6800%Python 2800%Shell 500%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1fix: `decodeEventLog` mixing order of parameters

in wevm/viem

stars on the PR repository3552

+62/-9

TypeScript 7000%MDX 3000%

Score

#27.20e

in odota/dotaconstants

stars on the PR repository386

+289/-126

TypeScript 9700%JavaScript 300%

Score

#3Add new permanent buffs 7.20

in odota/dotaconstants

stars on the PR repository386

+303/-271

TypeScript 9700%JavaScript 300%

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

wrapPageElement is not working when being exported using CommonJS syntax

gatsbyjs/gatsby

stars55939

comments30

Score

#2Issue

Usage of 💯 for first realease.

carloscuesta/gitmoji

stars16793

comments16

Score

#3Issue

Button handlers stop working when `enablePackageExports` flag is true

tamagui/tamagui

stars14184

comments9

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

240

Merged external PRs counted

240

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

External issues counted

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology