Developer Profile

Gavin Stark

@gstark

Saint Petersburg, FL

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

45 / 100Raw: 327.00

Repository Score

27 / 100Raw: 37.00

PR Score

70 / 100Raw: 684.00

Contribution Score

19 / 100Raw: 24.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)5% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)94% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)1% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1tesla-api

stars21

forks5

Ruby 10000%

Score

#2agent-manager

stars2

forks1

Go 9900%Shell 100%

Score

#3dotfiles

stars1

forks0

Shell 6900%Lua 2000%Vim Script 900%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1Adds maze drawing app

in tidbyt/community

stars on the PR repository425

+336/-0

Starlark 10000%

Score

#2Adds a per page pixel difference tolerance option

in vslavik/diff-pdf

stars on the PR repository4314

+26/-6

C++ 5100%M4 4500%Shell 400%

Score

#3Fixes comparison in validation error

in graphiti-api/spraypaint.js

stars on the PR repository112

+71/-15

TypeScript 9900%JavaScript 100%

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

Error "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'command')" when starting project

fi3ework/vite-plugin-checker

stars1239

comments4

Score

#2Issue

IDE:-vscode to include "ruby.format": "standard"

standardrb/standard

stars2922

comments3

Score

#3Issue

Is it possible to track GVL hold time as well?

Shopify/gvltools

stars153

comments3

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

Merged external PRs counted

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology