Developer Profile

Evgeny Mankov

@emankov

Belgrade, Serbia

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

34 / 100Raw: 268.00

Repository Score

2 / 100Raw: 2.00

PR Score

66 / 100Raw: 581.00

Contribution Score

35 / 100Raw: 53.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)0% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)98% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)2% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1HIPIFY

stars1

forks0

C++ 4800%Cuda 4200%Perl 1000%

Score

#2llvm-project

stars1

forks0

C++ 4800%LLVM 2900%Assembly 1100%

Score

#3pytorch

stars0

forks0

C++ 5000%Python 3300%Cuda 1000%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1[HIPIFY][#2563][SPARSELt][refactor][tests] `cuSPARSELt` support - Step 8 - `CUSPARSELT_VERSION`-dependent testing

in ROCm/HIPIFY

stars on the PR repository725

+138/-44

C++ 4800%Cuda 4200%Perl 1000%

Score

#2[HIPIFY][FILE][fix] Fix `cuFile->hipFile` data types mapping

in ROCm/HIPIFY

stars on the PR repository725

+99/-76

C++ 4800%Cuda 4200%Perl 1000%

Score

#3[HIPIFY][#2563][SPARSELt][feature] `cuSPARSELt` support - Step 4 - `cuSPARSELt v.0.1.0`

in ROCm/HIPIFY

stars on the PR repository725

+107/-72

C++ 4800%Cuda 4200%Perl 1000%

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

What happened to `hipTexRefGetArray` and other texture functions?

ROCm/hip

stars4397

comments7

Score

#2Issue

[16.0.1][release] Source archives are damaged and incomplete

llvm/llvm-project

stars40397

comments4

Score

#3Issue

[HIPIFY][clang][build] Build failure when build against LLVM ToT 18.0.0git

ROCm/HIPIFY

stars725

comments5

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

300

Merged external PRs counted

300

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology