Developer Profile

Daniel Gatis

@danielgatis

Recife - PE

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

64 / 100Raw: 322.00

Repository Score

74 / 100Raw: 286.00

PR Score

58 / 100Raw: 410.00

Contribution Score

47 / 100Raw: 88.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)40% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)57% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)3% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1rembg

stars24574

forks2405

Python 9300%Inno Setup 600%

101

Score

#2puppeteer-recaptcha-solver

stars645

forks109

JavaScript 10000%

Score

#3imgcat

stars414

forks19

Go 10000%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1feat: add MCP server with OAuth 2.1 authentication

in shellhub-io/shellhub

stars on the PR repository2063

+501/-20

TypeScript 5200%Go 4300%MDX 300%

Score

#2feat(namespace): add device auto-accept setting

in shellhub-io/shellhub

stars on the PR repository2063

+453/-3

TypeScript 5200%Go 4300%MDX 300%

Score

#3feat: add device custom fields

in shellhub-io/shellhub

stars on the PR repository2063

+1302/-38

TypeScript 5200%Go 4300%MDX 300%

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

Nvim + tmux show colors code in command line

neovim/neovim

stars102068

comments15

Score

#2Issue

moment.js and scope.$watch when objectEquality is true

angular/angular.js

stars58523

comments13

Score

#3Issue

Results without fringe

xuebinqin/U-2-Net

stars9855

comments10

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

Merged external PRs counted

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

External issues counted

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology