Developer Profile

Carlos Alexandro Becker

@caarlos0

Brazil

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

82 / 100Raw: 1451.00

Repository Score

81 / 100Raw: 415.00

PR Score

90 / 100Raw: 2787.00

Contribution Score

49 / 100Raw: 95.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)13% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)86% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)1% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1env

stars6302

forks283

Go 9900%Makefile 100%

Score

#2starcharts

stars1422

forks142

Go 7700%Go Template 1000%CSS 800%

Score

#3svu

stars867

forks55

Go 9800%Shell 100%Dockerfile 100%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1docs: update go sdk examples

in github/awesome-copilot

stars on the PR repository38524

+122/-156

JavaScript 4900%Python 3900%HTML 600%

116

Score

#2perf: timer leak in setupSubscriber

in charmbracelet/crush

stars on the PR repository27855

+175/-1

Go 9900%Go Template 100%

113

Score

#3fix(ui): consistent box sizing

in charmbracelet/crush

stars on the PR repository27855

+86/-124

Go 9900%Go Template 100%

113

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Discussion

Dockers V2

goreleaser/goreleaser

stars16013

comments17

Score

#2Issue

archive/zip: feature: support streamable archives

golang/go

stars137103

comments9

Score

#3Issue

net/http: race condition on windows when using os.File as request body

golang/go

stars137103

comments8

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

300

Merged external PRs counted

300

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology