Developer Profile

Alex Xiong

@alxiong

Singapore

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

57 / 100Raw: 1127.00

Repository Score

29 / 100Raw: 42.00

PR Score

89 / 100Raw: 2451.00

Contribution Score

36 / 100Raw: 56.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)2% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)98% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)0% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1ark-srs

stars3

forks1

watchers2

Rust91%Shell6%Nix3%

Score

#2ntu-thesis-latex

stars5

forks1

watchers1

BibTeX Style55%TeX44%

Score

#3vrs

stars2

forks0

watchers1

Rust100%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1Detailed Installation Guide added to README.md

in vyperlang/vyper

stars on the PR repository5182

+84/-3

Python100%

Score

#2Add Chinese Translated Version

in ConsenSysDiligence/smart-contract-best-practices

stars on the PR repository7564

+1105/-0

HTML100%

Score

#3Add crypto_box::ChaChaBox support

in RustCrypto/AEADs

stars on the PR repository967

+300/-108

Rust100%

Score

Community Contributions

Most impactful public issues and discussions

#1Issue

Alloy binding failed: unable to parse token from invalid AST

foundry-rs/foundry

stars10665

comments10

Score

#2Issue

Questions about the code base

fplll/fplll

stars410

comments9

Score

#3Issue

feat(`forge bind`): dedupe generated alloy type bindings by sharing types

foundry-rs/foundry

stars10665

comments3

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

298

Merged external PRs counted

298

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology