Developer Profile

Francisco Rodriguez-Sanchez

@Pakillo

Sevilla, Spain

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

67 / 100Raw: 473.00

Repository Score

68 / 100Raw: 217.00

PR Score

73 / 100Raw: 824.00

Contribution Score

29 / 100Raw: 41.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)21% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)78% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)1% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1grateful

stars242

forks20

R 9800%TeX 200%

Score

#2LM-GLM-GLMM-intro

stars123

forks30

R 10000%

Score

#3getting-job-data-science

stars85

forks23

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1Create ecosistemas.csl

in citation-style-language/styles

stars on the PR repository3888

+185/-0

Ruby 10000%

Score

#2fixing typos

in datacarpentry/R-ecology-lesson

stars on the PR repository337

+319/-23

R 10000%

Score

#3Mentioning reprex package to create reproducible examples

in datacarpentry/R-ecology-lesson

stars on the PR repository337

+20/-17

R 10000%

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

Error: `check_model()` returned following error: Following variable(s) were not found: Component Possibly misspelled?

easystats/performance

stars1152

comments7

Score

#2Issue

adding the new dplyr::filter_out?

elbersb/tidylog

stars623

comments8

Score

#3Discussion

How to generate all equations as images in Word format

quarto-dev/quarto-cli

stars5970

comments4

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

Merged external PRs counted

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

100

External issues counted

100

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology