Developer Profile

José Antonio Concepción

@JoseAConcepcion

La Habana, Cuba.

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

18 / 100Raw: 40.00

Repository Score

22 / 100Raw: 27.00

PR Score

17 / 100Raw: 60.00

Contribution Score

10 / 100Raw: 11.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)30% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)67% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)3% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1polyclinic-ml-project

stars1

forks4

Jupyter Notebook 10000%

Score

#2EDO-FinalWork

stars2

forks1

TeX 9400%Python 600%

Score

#3yafalmair

stars1

forks0

TypeScript 6900%Rust 1500%CSS 1400%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1feat: update design of zoom controls on new map

in ONEARMY/community-platform

stars on the PR repository1401

+33/-8

TypeScript 9700%PLpgSQL 200%CSS 100%

Score

#223 automatizar docker

in ANJEMI/distributed-systems-project

stars on the PR repository0

+103/-42

Python 9200%Shell 700%Dockerfile 100%

Score

#323 automatizar docker

in ANJEMI/distributed-systems-project

stars on the PR repository0

+103/-42

Python 9200%Shell 700%Dockerfile 100%

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

Is there a way to manually add flags to the models?

jakovius/voxd

stars293

comments5

Score

#2Issue

José Antonio Concepción y José Miguel Zayas

matcom/algos

stars10

comments1

Score

#3Issue

Policlínicos de Cuba

matcom/ML-24-25

stars0

comments0

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

Merged external PRs counted

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

External issues counted

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology