Developer Profile

Naoya Muramatsu

@DenDen047

Cape Town

GitHub

Impact Score Overview

Developer Impact & Statistics

Final Score

38 / 100Raw: 201.00

Repository Score

23 / 100Raw: 30.00

PR Score

58 / 100Raw: 411.00

Contribution Score

19 / 100Raw: 24.00

Score Weight Distribution

finalScore = repoScore * 0.45 + prScore * 0.45 + contributionScore * 0.10

Repository Score (45%)7% of final signal

Pull Request Score (45%)92% of final signal

Contribution Score (10%)1% of final signal

Top Work

Top Work & Highlights

Top Repositories

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1WildPose_v1.1

stars6

forks0

C++ 6900%Python 3000%Shell 100%

Score

#2pytorch-template

stars2

forks0

Jupyter Notebook 9700%Python 200%

Score

#3paper-reproducer

stars1

forks0

Python 5400%Shell 2500%HTML 1900%

Score

Top Pull Requests

Most impactful repositories and pull requests

#1Dockerfile

in Nandaka/PixivUtil2

stars on the PR repository2697

+59/-23

Python 9900%HTML 100%

Score

#2apt -> apt-get in Dockerfile

in deepfakes/faceswap

stars on the PR repository57539

+5/-5

Python 9900%Shell 100%

Score

#3Deciding the range of frame used for the 3D reconstruction

in African-Robotics-Unit/AcinoSet

stars on the PR repository72

+434/-455

Jupyter Notebook 8200%Python 1700%MATLAB 100%

Score

Community Contributions

comments

#1Issue

example/mnist/train_mnist.py fails when using GPU

chainer/chainer

stars5919

comments10

Score

#2Issue

The results of FTE are weird.

African-Robotics-Unit/AcinoSet

stars72

comments3

Score

#3Issue

Inquiry: Reasons for choosing XPath over CSS selectors

EZ-hwh/AutoScraper

stars492

comments0

Score

Scoring Transparency

▼

Repositories analyzed

Pull requests analyzed

Merged external PRs counted

Own-repo PRs ignored

Unmerged PRs ignored

Unique external repositories

Issues analyzed

External issues counted

Discussions analyzed

External discussions counted

How this score was calculated

View the full scoring methodology with formulas, penalties, and step-by-step flow.

View full methodology